<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom Wins - Round Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/</link>
	<description>The Journey of a Passionate Photographer</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 08:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good post - I am in the same boat (like many) and have been using Lightroom for a while now. I tried Aperture in both 1 and 2 guises and just never clicked. I will be trying it every now and again just to check!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post - I am in the same boat (like many) and have been using Lightroom for a while now. I tried Aperture in both 1 and 2 guises and just never clicked. I will be trying it every now and again just to check!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denny</title>
		<link>http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I've had the exact same experience with Aperture and have moved over to Light Room. After using Aperture for 10 months I've really grown to like the interface and workflow as well as system integration with OS X. My switch to Light Room just over a month ago was almost accidental and certainly not planned. After trying out AP 2 I've confirmed my decision to stay with LR. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I really wish Apple would reconsider its decision to rely so heavily on the GPU for the heavy lifting in Aperture. I think it was a big mistake and from what I'm reading around the web many others feel the same way. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After a month with LR I'm increasingly happy with it and  the LR community is excellent bonus.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had the exact same experience with Aperture and have moved over to Light Room. After using Aperture for 10 months I&#8217;ve really grown to like the interface and workflow as well as system integration with OS X. My switch to Light Room just over a month ago was almost accidental and certainly not planned. After trying out AP 2 I&#8217;ve confirmed my decision to stay with LR. </p>

<p>I really wish Apple would reconsider its decision to rely so heavily on the GPU for the heavy lifting in Aperture. I think it was a big mistake and from what I&#8217;m reading around the web many others feel the same way. </p>

<p>After a month with LR I&#8217;m increasingly happy with it and  the LR community is excellent bonus.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very well reasoned and I particularly like the communication part:Apple hasn't said a thing to support folks who adopted Aperture and have been hanging out to dry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, like you, after I tried Lightroom I was impressed with its snappiness on my computer and have stuck with it. I put my thinking on paper so to speak here: &lt;a href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/10/30/aperture-lightroom-and-me/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Aperture, Lightroom and Me&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well reasoned and I particularly like the communication part:Apple hasn&#8217;t said a thing to support folks who adopted Aperture and have been hanging out to dry.</p>

<p>But, like you, after I tried Lightroom I was impressed with its snappiness on my computer and have stuck with it. I put my thinking on paper so to speak here: <a href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/10/30/aperture-lightroom-and-me/" rel="nofollow">Aperture, Lightroom and Me</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightroom Wins - A Perspective on Aperture 2.0</title>
		<link>http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightroom Wins - A Perspective on Aperture 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jordannielsen.com/blog/2008/03/03/lightroom-wins-round-two/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Jordon Nielsen posted his opinions on Aperture 2.0 and why he&#8217;s sticking with Lightroom. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jordon Nielsen posted his opinions on Aperture 2.0 and why he&#8217;s sticking with Lightroom. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
